CNM x CRM: Choosing the Judiciary? Trial by jury By: Ivan G. Paz Fernández (*)
The National Judicial Council (CNM) is a body of pseudo-democratic façade created to satisfy political interests partisans and thus have a body "evaluator - coach", which comply with the formalities to install in the Judicial Branch "friends or fellow" of exercising executive and legislative branches.
Having as clear intention that, if they (our government) eventually offend his friends on the cusp of the justice system will have to return the favor absolving them of the plane, whether exculpatory scandalous failure of a judge or Vocal, benevolent or the investigation or prosecution of a Public Prosecutor.
Being in such circumstances, that gives a well-articulated shameful-but-legal representatives of a judiciary that is able to (read my article FALSE JUDICIAL POWER in my blog), because the only powers Powers State if born, if and only if the popular vote and universal suffrage.
While it is true that our Constitution gives them a framework gives legality "Article 150: The CNM is responsible for the selection and appointment of judges and prosecutors, except when those elected by the people" is also true that our Constitution itself provides a more democratic and interesting alternative in Chapter VIII The Judiciary Section 139, Inc. 17 The popular participation in the appointment and removal of judges. As for the arguments and unspoken understanding, the preferred mass citizen action is more oriented to reflect the popular will to the extent that vulgar it begins to understand and value.
citizens must not allow our incipient democracy institutions such as lunges follow CNM, it is not ALL because only becomes Peruvians to vote only in areas "professionals" to choose people usually political partisans the same that they then choose to "characters" with political tint or line dance to music that will touch the current government.
On the other hand, from the capital once more, is scanned under a stifling centralism always, the selection of candidates virtually unknown in places where they have to dispatch, when local residents, most knowledgeable about their "lawyers" who would like to become magistrates, therefore appears to be the popular choice - somehow - a guarantee of the selection process.
A true rule of law, must be supported by proper and adequate institutional framework that reflects the popular mood is therefore not be allowed to transcend organizations like these, being part of conspiracy to give a pseudo democratic legality and and manage some of the power should be conferred only a reflection of popular will.
view of the above, the institutions of organized civil society, must begin to promote and lead proposals Citizen Democratic Regional Council of the Magistracy (CRM) eminently local, to which judges and prosecutors can choose by popular election only, adding to it the eminent citizen watchdog, that the reverse happened and when they are ejected irregularities found judges popularly elected, and institutions such as the Control Body of the Judiciary (OCMA), among others ODICMA and would have no rationale, because they are the first to break the basic principle of fairness to the extent that always judge and party, and where a judge investigates a "colleague" later-in twist of life-can be judged by the same judge, case by other nonsense.
is therefore pray and raise awareness to members of professional associations (members of Civil Society), not being part therefore does not support the proposal for elections for members of the CNM, that are to long as accomplices of the democratic shortcomings of our permanent and quasi-justice system is always broken. Only
rearranging our democratic system especially emphasizing the justice sector, then we will be complaining, framed in the adage, "If the people elected, that people judge them" (IFP) and unappetizing argument become extremely unpleasant for the judges (Judges) and charged (Tax), much more for your "friends" Corrupt (Political).
The battle against corruption in the judiciary will win only if satisfied the citizen jury, there is another formula, and consequently professional friends do not sin out of ignorance because they are not ignorant.
(*) Project Director juries. PROMOTING DEVELOPMENT
Civil Association.
http://projurados.blogspot.com/