 |
| Ivan G. Paz Fernández |
We overcome with emotion to be announced a real change in the administration of justice by involving the city, the good spirits calm continue with the analysis the bill sent by the Executive, profile given by our institution in August of 2006 (we have the evidence), the disappointment was great to find new "tricks invented" to make lies look like truth, calling Citizens Judges (JC) which is the participation of two (2) professional laymen right in our decadent justice. No choice but to wish him the reasons for his failure to be exposed.
This new monstrosity, in the future will show that our nation is not to copy inventions "reinvented", refers to similar bodies operating in the Andean region that assessment to be false because in Venezuela there is the aforementioned jurors from jury twelve (12) citizens plus a judge, and in Bolivia there are eleven (11) representatives of the people, is suitable also warned that are harmful experiences that have not worked, because the jury has been distorted in its essence with political infiltration or narrow interests. It has not been the case in which the jury as is the English system was imposed, as is the case of Argentina (which will copy almost all laws), Panama, Colombia and Brazil where it works well.
Citizens Judges are elected for two years intervened in three cases annually, which will happen when their verdict is antagonistic generating a draw, as is always the judge who has the the end casting power, imposing its verdict in the case of twelve (12) jury trial wins with nine (9) votes, with three rooms a strong and respectable number of the majority opinion.
Bad thoughts citizens imagine that a "good intention" to democratize the judicial bribery, taking into account that individuals will go to visit the Citizens Judges to their homes to settle their disputes out of court because they will soon because as always the last word will be in the second instance or higher has been as it is, with delegationships always recognized, that is where it always ends up resorting to ask a "little help". The jury trial is like a second instance (no vocals) and they only go to a particular subject keeping in view the identity and addresses of its members for obvious reasons. Judges
Citizens are working only in criminal proceedings in the jury extends to civil cases by empathy especially in tort liability suits, which may well destroy the prejudices of certain service companies that abuse of illegal charges, and end basic principle for a settlement when the abuse continued in the following months. I mention those were controversial court cases to reach our ears, where a poor and abused simply-citizen wins a trial to a super corporation, because that only happens in places where trial by jury is a reality here, as is obvious even in dreams happen. And as you will in cases of public administration in which it accused an official or former public official and even where they can drop the same Judges Citizens should they collude or corrupted in a trial.
Who guarantees us that, the computer system "intelligently managed" by the State which will select two citizens, one is devoted to choosing the party of government, remember they currently monopolize all instances of the administration of justice and the new idea is summarized in "unemployed colleagues warn that it will get a chambita that lasted two years." In contrast and as elementary dictionary is a Court Jury unprofessional or permanent, with a possibility of being applied in our country's regional governments are the ones who should handle the computerized listing of potential jurors.
will include "professional" non-lawyers, as if being a "professional" adequacy guarantee in our country, note that our justice system is full of professionals including there are doctors, magisters, PHD, but justice does not work. In contrast the jury who is a citizen regardless of the level of education but taught honorable justice on the basis of their discretion and common sense, knowing the difference between good and evil, which is the reason for not requiring a high degree instruction, thus including all the people it is the opportunity to make a respectable settler ignorant but a citizen first, the state trained and geared not only to establish justice, while you strengthen citizenship, instill values \u200b\u200band virtues, duties and rights restored, we cultivate education, culture and knowledge etc with the sole purpose of leading to their home and environment warning multiplier effect that justice if it works and I do think the criminals in your neighborhood that justice is born of the people making them think more infallible than twice before offending.
It is essential that people know that a jury is not an issue of attorneys or lawyers, then, if so, they already had, but on the contrary they are the ones who consistently oppose that this ancient democratic institution in our country to be brought under the unusual concept of not being prepared, when in fact they who must be prepared for this inevitable changes that globalization brings in a certain way based on the Common Law, Common Law, which is not and never has been the product of lawyers, if not the people, to be understood by common people, ignorant, humble but honorable the legal profession and the judiciary have worked together for English, as English jurist said Maitland, "The right is not too fine for use as power."
However, even when the executive has time for good guidelines for a real jury trial lambayecana delivered by the institution that founded the subject of trials by juries, there is a meanness of guiding a subject's own people a pseudo-expert in matters of justice that only know of laws.
Jury Impossible?, Means that the poor have not found an answer, the problems of our justice system and establish if they have solution for trial by jury in our nation, will involve radical changes in the structures of our society, with clearly positive results and where you as a citizen has every right and duty to participate. Leave by notice to you dear reader that expresses the owner, if juries, but judges Citizens is a lie but to the people.
(*) ANALYST - Director: PROPOSED JURY (PRO-JURY)
Promoting Civil Partnership Development
0 comments:
Post a Comment